Public Finance and Employment: Expenditures according to COFOG Special
< < >-< OECD.Stat
Open all groups and itemsClose all groups and itemsSend link via emailPrintOpen in stand alone windowClose this window
Click to expand Source
Click to collapse Source
Click to expand Contact person/organisation
Click to collapse Contact person/organisation

OECD statistics contact: Gov.Contact@oecd.org

Click to expand Data source(s) used
Click to collapse Data source(s) used

Eurostat: COFOG first and second level.

Click to expand Data Characteristics
Click to collapse Data Characteristics
Click to expand Unit of measure used
Click to collapse Unit of measure used

National currency; current prices. Expressed in millions.

Click to expand Concepts & Classifications
Click to collapse Concepts & Classifications
Click to expand Classification(s) used
Click to collapse Classification(s) used

COFOG-Special, requested by the Working Party of Senior Budget Officials of the OECD, was developed in 2004 as part of an OECD study on Reallocation. COFOG-Special is an adaptation of regular COFOG, which aims to provide additional information that is particularly important for gaining comparative insight into the structure of public expenditures. In particular, COFOG-Special adds to regular COFOG three distinctions between kinds of expenditure, namely:
1. the split between expenditures for the provision of collective versus individual goods and services;
2. the split between expenditures for cash transfers versus goods and services in kind;
3. the split between expenditures for individual goods and services in kind for allocative versus distributive purposes.

Click to expand Other Aspects
Click to collapse Other Aspects
Click to expand Other comments
Click to collapse Other comments

These splits make it possible to characterize the structure of public finances in OECD countries according to the different types of welfare state. This, in turn, makes it possible for countries to compare themselves with other relevant member countries and may stimulate the national policy debate about questions such as decentralization, redistribution, privatization, the role of the non?profit sector and the application of user fees.

Click to expand Recommended uses and limitations
Click to collapse Recommended uses and limitations

The methodology applied to make the required splits has been developed since 2004 and has gradually become more accurate. The most recent methodology, used in the PFED of 2009, makes use of second level COFOG data and has been applied in a test procedure on five European countries (of which three are OECD countries) that have provided second level COFOG data to Eurostat. In the course of 2007 and 2008, more countries made available second level COFOG data to Eurostat.

Public Finance and Employment: Expenditures according to COFOG SpecialContact person/organisation

OECD statistics contact: Gov.Contact@oecd.org

Data source(s) used

Eurostat: COFOG first and second level.

Unit of measure used

National currency; current prices. Expressed in millions.

Classification(s) used

COFOG-Special, requested by the Working Party of Senior Budget Officials of the OECD, was developed in 2004 as part of an OECD study on Reallocation. COFOG-Special is an adaptation of regular COFOG, which aims to provide additional information that is particularly important for gaining comparative insight into the structure of public expenditures. In particular, COFOG-Special adds to regular COFOG three distinctions between kinds of expenditure, namely:
1. the split between expenditures for the provision of collective versus individual goods and services;
2. the split between expenditures for cash transfers versus goods and services in kind;
3. the split between expenditures for individual goods and services in kind for allocative versus distributive purposes.

Recommended uses and limitations

The methodology applied to make the required splits has been developed since 2004 and has gradually become more accurate. The most recent methodology, used in the PFED of 2009, makes use of second level COFOG data and has been applied in a test procedure on five European countries (of which three are OECD countries) that have provided second level COFOG data to Eurostat. In the course of 2007 and 2008, more countries made available second level COFOG data to Eurostat.

Other comments

These splits make it possible to characterize the structure of public finances in OECD countries according to the different types of welfare state. This, in turn, makes it possible for countries to compare themselves with other relevant member countries and may stimulate the national policy debate about questions such as decentralization, redistribution, privatization, the role of the non?profit sector and the application of user fees.