Fossil Fuel Support - POL
< < >-< OECD.Stat
Open all groups and itemsClose all groups and itemsSend link via emailPrintOpen in stand alone windowClose this window
Click to expand Database Specific
Click to collapse Database Specific
Click to expand Abstract
Click to collapse Abstract

POLAND: GENERAL METADATA

Data documentation

General notes

The fiscal year in Poland normally coincides with the calendar year. Corporations, however, may choose a different starting point of the fiscal year.


Producer Support Estimate

Most of Polish state aid to the energy sector is apportioned to the coal industry. Poland’s heavy reliance on coal stems from both a large domestic endowment of this fuel and the fact that it used to have a limited access to foreign-exchange earnings with which it could have imported other fuels during the communist period. Because coal-mining was considered a strategic sector, the state subsidised the production of coal, providing various social benefits to coal miners and regulating coal prices to keep them low.

With the economic transition of the early 1990s, the state envisioned to transform coal mines into self-reliant commercial companies that would adapt to the conditions of a free-market economy. The continued policy of price controls, however, meant that the industry had a very limited potential for economic growth and hence, needed further state assistance.

All subsequent plans for restructuring the coal sector throughout the 1990s supported capacity adjustment, shutting down unprofitable mines and reducing employment to levels that would improve productivity. The overarching objective of those programmes was thus to make the coal-mining sector profitable.

These programmes proved ineffective due to the lack of consensus between the government and the trade unions. This changed in 1998 as the new government, supported by Solidarno?? (the biggest Polish trade union), devised a coal-mining restructuring plan, the Reforma górnictwa w?gla kamiennego w Polsce w latach 1998 - 2002. The plan provided additional funding for social schemes and expressed a commitment to write-off the debt which the mines have accumulated over the years. Another plan adopted in 2003 - the Program restrukturyzacji górnictwa w?gla kamiennego w Polsce w latach 2003-2006 - pursued similar objectives.

When Poland joined the European Union in 2004, state aid became subject to the Community rules. In practice, this development meant that coal-mining restructuring plans would have to be compatible with the common market, and that the European Commission would need to approve any state-aid scheme before it reached recipients.

The Council of Ministers has so far adopted two documents regarding the restructuring of the sector: the Restrukturyzacja górnictwa w?gla kamiennego w latach 2004-2006 oraz strategia na lata 2007-2010, which was then replaced by Strategia dzia?alno?ci górnictwa w?gla kamiennego w Polsce w latach 2007-2015. Poland does not provide subsidies to coal-mining under article 5-3 (current production aid). All current subsidies therefore result from article 7 (aid to cover exceptional costs) and are associated either with mine decommissioning or investment aid to operating mines (for up to 30% of the total investments made). The former measures are mainly allocated to the GSSE as most of them do not increase current production or consumption of coal. The latter are allocated to the PSE since they directly support coal producers.

The coal-mining sector underwent major restructuring through a series of management mergers and mine closures. At the beginning of the transition, the industry comprised of 71 independent mines. In 1993, the management of hard-coal production was taken over by seven joint-stock holding companies that held the assets of 60 mines. Four mines remained stand-alone enterprises, while the rest was shut down on unprofitability grounds.

The Polish coal-mining sector now comprises 31 mines grouped into seven joint-stock holding companies and is dominated by three state-owned firms: Europe’s largest hard-coal company, Kompania W?glowa S.A. (KW), Katowicki Holding W?glowy S.A. (KHW) and Jastrz?bska Spó?ka W?glowa S.A. In 2000, two state-owned liquidation companies, Spó?ka Restrukturyzacji Kopal? S.A. (SRK) and Bytomska Spó?ka Restrukturyzacji Kopal? Sp. z o.o. (BSRK), were given responsibility to manage mine decommissioning. Since 2006, only two companies in Poland have been benefitting from state aid: KW and KHW. Aid is also being envisaged for the SRK (BSRK was consolidated into SRK in 2009).


Click to expand Source
Click to collapse Source
Click to expand Contact person/organisation
Click to collapse Contact person/organisation
Click to expand Name of collection/source
Click to collapse Name of collection/source

OECD Companion to the Inventory of Support Measures for Fossil Fuels 2021

Click to expand Data Characteristics
Click to collapse Data Characteristics
Click to expand Date last updated
Click to collapse Date last updated

Nov-23

Click to expand Other data characteristics
Click to collapse Other data characteristics

Data for 2022 are preliminary and may contain OECD-generated estimates.

Click to expand Periodicity
Click to collapse Periodicity

Annual

Click to expand Power code
Click to collapse Power code
Units
Click to expand Unit of measure used
Click to collapse Unit of measure used
Zloty
Click to expand Concepts & Classifications
Click to collapse Concepts & Classifications
Click to expand Key statistical concept
Click to collapse Key statistical concept

Indicator

PSE: Producer Support Estimate

GSSE: General Services Support Estimate

CSE: Consumer Support Estimate

Stage

EXTRACT: Extraction or mining stage

TRANS: Transportation of fossil fuels (e.g., through pipelines)

REFIN: Refining or processing stage

GENER: Use of fossil fuels in ectricity generation

INDUS: Use of fossil fuels in the industrial sector

END: Other end uses of fossil fuels

Statutory or Formal Incidence

consumption: Direct consumption

returns: Output Returns

income: Enterprise Income

inputs: Cost of Intermediate Inputs

labour: Labour

land: Land and natural resources

capital: Capital

knowledge: Knowledge

Click to expand Other Aspects
Click to collapse Other Aspects
Click to expand Other comments
Click to collapse Other comments
Click to expand Recommended uses and limitations
Click to collapse Recommended uses and limitations

1) Fiscal cost of support measures for fossil fuels are based on information reported by countries through official documentation (e.g. budget reports). Support measures for which such information is not available are excluded from the aggregate amount reported in this table. In addition, support measures in certain countries may not have been exhaustively identified.


2) Tax expenditures are estimates of revenue that is foregone due to a particular feature of the tax system that reduces or postpones tax payments (relative to a jurisdiction’s benchmark tax system) to the benefit of fossil fuels’ producers or users. Hence, (i) tax expenditures estimates can increase either because of greater concessions (relative to the benchmark tax system) or because of an increase in the benchmark itself; (ii) cross-country comparisons of tax expenditures can be misleading due to country-specific benchmark tax systems.


3) Support measures for fossil fuels are included in the Inventory without reference to their economic or environmental effects. No judgment is therefore made as to whether such measures are inefficient or ought to be reformed.

Fossil Fuel Support - POLAbstract

POLAND: GENERAL METADATA

Data documentation

General notes

The fiscal year in Poland normally coincides with the calendar year. Corporations, however, may choose a different starting point of the fiscal year.


Producer Support Estimate

Most of Polish state aid to the energy sector is apportioned to the coal industry. Poland’s heavy reliance on coal stems from both a large domestic endowment of this fuel and the fact that it used to have a limited access to foreign-exchange earnings with which it could have imported other fuels during the communist period. Because coal-mining was considered a strategic sector, the state subsidised the production of coal, providing various social benefits to coal miners and regulating coal prices to keep them low.

With the economic transition of the early 1990s, the state envisioned to transform coal mines into self-reliant commercial companies that would adapt to the conditions of a free-market economy. The continued policy of price controls, however, meant that the industry had a very limited potential for economic growth and hence, needed further state assistance.

All subsequent plans for restructuring the coal sector throughout the 1990s supported capacity adjustment, shutting down unprofitable mines and reducing employment to levels that would improve productivity. The overarching objective of those programmes was thus to make the coal-mining sector profitable.

These programmes proved ineffective due to the lack of consensus between the government and the trade unions. This changed in 1998 as the new government, supported by Solidarno?? (the biggest Polish trade union), devised a coal-mining restructuring plan, the Reforma górnictwa w?gla kamiennego w Polsce w latach 1998 - 2002. The plan provided additional funding for social schemes and expressed a commitment to write-off the debt which the mines have accumulated over the years. Another plan adopted in 2003 - the Program restrukturyzacji górnictwa w?gla kamiennego w Polsce w latach 2003-2006 - pursued similar objectives.

When Poland joined the European Union in 2004, state aid became subject to the Community rules. In practice, this development meant that coal-mining restructuring plans would have to be compatible with the common market, and that the European Commission would need to approve any state-aid scheme before it reached recipients.

The Council of Ministers has so far adopted two documents regarding the restructuring of the sector: the Restrukturyzacja górnictwa w?gla kamiennego w latach 2004-2006 oraz strategia na lata 2007-2010, which was then replaced by Strategia dzia?alno?ci górnictwa w?gla kamiennego w Polsce w latach 2007-2015. Poland does not provide subsidies to coal-mining under article 5-3 (current production aid). All current subsidies therefore result from article 7 (aid to cover exceptional costs) and are associated either with mine decommissioning or investment aid to operating mines (for up to 30% of the total investments made). The former measures are mainly allocated to the GSSE as most of them do not increase current production or consumption of coal. The latter are allocated to the PSE since they directly support coal producers.

The coal-mining sector underwent major restructuring through a series of management mergers and mine closures. At the beginning of the transition, the industry comprised of 71 independent mines. In 1993, the management of hard-coal production was taken over by seven joint-stock holding companies that held the assets of 60 mines. Four mines remained stand-alone enterprises, while the rest was shut down on unprofitability grounds.

The Polish coal-mining sector now comprises 31 mines grouped into seven joint-stock holding companies and is dominated by three state-owned firms: Europe’s largest hard-coal company, Kompania W?glowa S.A. (KW), Katowicki Holding W?glowy S.A. (KHW) and Jastrz?bska Spó?ka W?glowa S.A. In 2000, two state-owned liquidation companies, Spó?ka Restrukturyzacji Kopal? S.A. (SRK) and Bytomska Spó?ka Restrukturyzacji Kopal? Sp. z o.o. (BSRK), were given responsibility to manage mine decommissioning. Since 2006, only two companies in Poland have been benefitting from state aid: KW and KHW. Aid is also being envisaged for the SRK (BSRK was consolidated into SRK in 2009).


Methodologyhttps://www.oecd.org/fossil-fuels/methodology/National Data Sourceshttp://stats.oecd.org/wbos/fileview2.aspx?IDFile=45ad3cc2-f230-4caa-88b3-889ca210494dOECD Fossil Fuel Support Portalhttps://www.oecd.org/fossil-fuels/
Contact person/organisation

ffs.contact@oecd.orgffs.contact@oecd.orgName of collection/source

OECD Companion to the Inventory of Support Measures for Fossil Fuels 2021

Unit of measure usedZlotyPower codeUnitsPeriodicity

Annual

Date last updated

Nov-23

Other data characteristics

Data for 2022 are preliminary and may contain OECD-generated estimates.

Key statistical concept

Indicator

PSE: Producer Support Estimate

GSSE: General Services Support Estimate

CSE: Consumer Support Estimate

Stage

EXTRACT: Extraction or mining stage

TRANS: Transportation of fossil fuels (e.g., through pipelines)

REFIN: Refining or processing stage

GENER: Use of fossil fuels in ectricity generation

INDUS: Use of fossil fuels in the industrial sector

END: Other end uses of fossil fuels

Statutory or Formal Incidence

consumption: Direct consumption

returns: Output Returns

income: Enterprise Income

inputs: Cost of Intermediate Inputs

labour: Labour

land: Land and natural resources

capital: Capital

knowledge: Knowledge

Recommended uses and limitations

1) Fiscal cost of support measures for fossil fuels are based on information reported by countries through official documentation (e.g. budget reports). Support measures for which such information is not available are excluded from the aggregate amount reported in this table. In addition, support measures in certain countries may not have been exhaustively identified.


2) Tax expenditures are estimates of revenue that is foregone due to a particular feature of the tax system that reduces or postpones tax payments (relative to a jurisdiction’s benchmark tax system) to the benefit of fossil fuels’ producers or users. Hence, (i) tax expenditures estimates can increase either because of greater concessions (relative to the benchmark tax system) or because of an increase in the benchmark itself; (ii) cross-country comparisons of tax expenditures can be misleading due to country-specific benchmark tax systems.


3) Support measures for fossil fuels are included in the Inventory without reference to their economic or environmental effects. No judgment is therefore made as to whether such measures are inefficient or ought to be reformed.

Other comments

OECD Companion to the Inventory of Support Measures for Fossil Fuels 2021https://doi.org/10.1787/e670c620-en