The database on Institutional Characteristics of Trade Unions, Wage Setting, State Intervention and Social Pacts (ICTWSS) has been developed by Prof. Jelle Visser at the University of Amsterdam. It was first released in May 2007. In its initial form, the ICTWSS database combined data from various sources and projects with a main focus on trade union in EU and OECD countries, collective bargaining and employment relations in Europe, and social pacts. In 2021, the ICTWSS database has been rebranded as the OECD/AIAS ICTWSS database. This new name reflects the joint effort by the OECD and AIAS-HSI to ensure the continuation of the database after Prof. Visser’s retirement. The OECD/AIAS ICTWSS database is publicly available at:
OECD/AIAS database on Institutional Characteristics of Trade Unions, Wage Setting, State Intervention and Social Pacts (ICTWSS)
21 May, 2021
Annual
Percentage of employees with the right to bargain
OECD is an estimation based on the employee-weighted average of the 38 member countries.
The adjusted collective bargaining coverage rate is defined as the number of employees covered by a collective agreement in force as a proportion of the number of eligible employees equipped (i.e., the total number of employees minus the number of employees legally excluded from the right to bargain). Data reported in this Table refer to the AdjCov_hist variable of the OECD/AIAS ICTWSS database and combine estimates based either on administrative sources or labour force surveys or both.For more information and full methodology, see:
Collective bargaining coverage rate represents the share of workers covered by valid collective agreements in force. What counts as a valid collective agreement in force is defined by international and national legislations and, in some case, tribunals. The OECD/AIAS ICTWSS database follows the rules and definitions of the ILO (ILO (2018), Quick guide on sources and uses of collective bargaining statistics, International Labour Organization, Geneva). In particular, only agreements negotiated by independent representation, i.e. bona fide trade unions, are considered. However, at this stage, given the limited sources available, it is not possible to fully rule that, in few instances, the data might also include some agreements negotiated by non-union bodies. But the problem, if confirmed, would be small and not such to put in question the comparability of the estimates.
The database on Institutional Characteristics of Trade Unions, Wage Setting, State Intervention and Social Pacts (ICTWSS) has been developed by Prof. Jelle Visser at the University of Amsterdam. It was first released in May 2007. In its initial form, the ICTWSS database combined data from various sources and projects with a main focus on trade union in EU and OECD countries, collective bargaining and employment relations in Europe, and social pacts. In 2021, the ICTWSS database has been rebranded as the OECD/AIAS ICTWSS database. This new name reflects the joint effort by the OECD and AIAS-HSI to ensure the continuation of the database after Prof. Visser’s retirement. The OECD/AIAS ICTWSS database is publicly available at:
OECD/AIAS database on Institutional Characteristics of Trade Unions, Wage Setting, State Intervention and Social Pacts (ICTWSS)
Percentage of employees with the right to bargain
Annual
21 May, 2021
The adjusted collective bargaining coverage rate is defined as the number of employees covered by a collective agreement in force as a proportion of the number of eligible employees equipped (i.e., the total number of employees minus the number of employees legally excluded from the right to bargain). Data reported in this Table refer to the AdjCov_hist variable of the OECD/AIAS ICTWSS database and combine estimates based either on administrative sources or labour force surveys or both.For more information and full methodology, see:
OECD is an estimation based on the employee-weighted average of the 38 member countries.
Collective bargaining coverage rate represents the share of workers covered by valid collective agreements in force. What counts as a valid collective agreement in force is defined by international and national legislations and, in some case, tribunals. The OECD/AIAS ICTWSS database follows the rules and definitions of the ILO (ILO (2018), Quick guide on sources and uses of collective bargaining statistics, International Labour Organization, Geneva). In particular, only agreements negotiated by independent representation, i.e. bona fide trade unions, are considered. However, at this stage, given the limited sources available, it is not possible to fully rule that, in few instances, the data might also include some agreements negotiated by non-union bodies. But the problem, if confirmed, would be small and not such to put in question the comparability of the estimates.